CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices

Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles April 13, 2009

Be a Marketplace Partner

 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking

Latest News

- 2631
- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
- Maingear Introduces the GeForce 3D Vision-powered Prelude 2
- Nintendo Will Introduce the DSi Handheld on April 5
- Toshiba To Buy Fujitsu's Hard Drive Business
News Archives


- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide


  • CPUs

    - AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE & X4 810 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    Be a Commerce Partner

    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Corporate Info
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


    Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Processor Review
    By Vince Freeman :  September 13, 2007

    Quake 4 Performance

    Quake 4 is the latest in 3D first-person shooters from id Software and Raven, and while the actual storyline is standard fare and the game itself is based on the DOOM 3 engine, the graphics are exceptional and it is an improvement over previous games. The lighting and shadow effects are excellent, and the overall level design and architecture are a real treat. The overall load on the graphics card can be extreme, which is both a blessing and a curse, depending on the actual hardware you are testing. For this test, we have upgraded to the 1.4 revision, and enabled the game's multi-threaded functionality.

    Quake 4 is based on the same engine as DOOM 3, and due to a combination of enhanced NVIDIA drivers and in-game multi-core support, it also rewards the extra multithreading of our dual and quad core processors. The overall framerates are looking better for the AMD processors, and the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ again outpaces the Core 2 Duo E6300 while coming much closer to the Core 2 Duo E6600. It does well relative to the other AMD processors, and the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ slides in right behind the 3.0 GHz Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

    F.E.A.R. Performance

    F.E.A.R. is one of the newer additions to our game benchmark suite, and it features jaw-dropping graphics and a physics engine that can bring any system to its knees. The game even includes a wide selection of System and Video settings, along with an in-game testing module to keep things 100% comparable. In this case, as we are dealing with CPU performance, we have racked the system and physics settings to maximum, while lowering the graphics quotient to minimum, in an attempt to get rid of any GPU limitations.

    F.E.A.R. is a great game for processor testing, as it allows the CPU portion of the test to be ramped up, while dropping the graphics component. The overall benchmark results follows the same basic pattern, and the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ again finishes between the Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6600.

    The Chronicles of Riddick Performance

    The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape from Butcher Bay is based on the movie franchise of the same name, and provides gamers with a wild mix of kick-ass action and intriguing environments. This hybrid game is similar to what Half-Life brought to the table, as you take the role of escaped can Riddick, and fight your way through some exceptionally rendered game levels. The in-game detail levels are also an important consideration, as moving the Shader Model above 2.0 can turn the game into a slide show, and even at SM 2.0, the game can bring most hardware to its knees.

    The Chronicles of Riddick is a very tough game benchmark, and the graphics component seems to be a real limiting factor that brings processor performance closer together. Although the score are close, the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ does compete well with both the AMD and Intel processors.

    Page 1 The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 4 SANDRA XI, CINEBENCH 9.5 and WinRAR Performance
    Page 5 MPEG-1, MPEG-2 and DivX 6.4 Performance
    Page 6 3DMark06 Pro, DOOM 3 and FarCry Performance
  • Page 7 Quake 4, F.E.A.R. and CoR Performance
    Page 8 Company of Heroes, Prey and Splinter Cell: CT Performance
    Page 9 Benchmark Analysis and System Power Consumption
    Page 10 Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2009 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers