CPU Prices

RAM Prices

Compare Prices

Sharky Extreme : CPU Reviews & Articles June 10, 2009

Be a Marketplace Partner

 Advertising Info

About the Double-Underlined Links

 - Most Active Threads
 - Technical Support
 - CPUs & Overclocking

Latest News

- 2631
- 2631
- SanDisk Upgrades its USB Memory Card Readers
- Maingear Introduces the GeForce 3D Vision-powered Prelude 2
- Nintendo Will Introduce the DSi Handheld on April 5
News Archives


- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- February High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide


  • CPUs

  • Motherboards

    - Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Motherboard Review
    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review

  • Video Cards

    Be a Commerce Partner

    Internet News
    Small Business
    Personal Technology

    Search internet.com
    Corporate Info
    Tech Jobs
    E-mail Offers


    Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Review
    By Vince Freeman :  October 29, 2007

    Real-World Usage

    Needless to say, the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is an extremely fast processor - in fact, it's the fastest desktop processor money can buy - and any enthusiast finding fault with 3.0 GHz of 45nm goodness needs to get a new hobby. Desktop performance is lightning fast, multi-tasking is smooth, multi-threading speed is the best on the market, and at 3.0 GHz, you certainly don't lose anything on the gaming side, and might even gain a few fps.

    But that's not what impressed us the most, as Intel has already been to the 3.0 GHz quad core mountain. Instead, the power usage and thermal results were just less than astounding. The Kentsfield is a very powerful and solid design, but moving up to a 3.0 GHz quad at 65nm does bring with it some caveats, from a high power draw to maxed out CPU fan speeds at full load. The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 offered a nice compromise, as power and heat levels were lower, and fan speeds stayed at low to medium levels the majority of the time.


    We're getting a sneak peek at the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, as the processor will not officially launch until November 12 of this year. Intel has not yet released pricing on the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, but we anticipate it following the other "Extreme" releases and sitting somewhere above the $1K mark. Now whether this represents a *value* is really beside the point, as the Intel Extreme line has never been about the dollars and cents, but rather to provide enthusiast buyers with the very fastest processors money can buy. Intel has certainly done that with the 3.0 GHz Core 2 Extreme QX9650, but mainstream buyers will likely wait for the Penryn to filter down a bit before taking the plunge.

    * Please note that these prices were taken at the time of review and are not meant to reflect long-term trends.


    We came away from this review with a decidedly positive outlook of Intel's 45nm world. The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is the fastest desktop processor yet, but it sports a lower power and thermal envelope than its 65nm quad core siblings. Other than its high price, the Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is an improvement in every way, and the larger L2 cache is a welcome enhancement. The first round of Intel quad core processors were great for the enthusiasts, but this is the first quad core design that we'd consider for a standard desktop configuration. Kentsfield was a very good start, but Yorkfield is quad core done right.


    • Top Desktop Performer
    • Excellent Power Usage Numbers
    • Media Creation Powerhouse


    • Expensive
    • 3.0 GHz Clock Speed


    Page 1 The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Processor
    Page 2 Test Setup and Benchmark Software
    Page 3 PCMark05 Pro Performance
    Page 4 SiSoft SANDRA XII Memory and Multi-Core Performance
    Page 5 Everest Ultimate Edition 4.2 Performance
    Page 6 CINEBENCH 9.5/10 and WinRAR Performance
    Page 7 MPEG-2, DivX, WMV, and High-Def Video Encoding Performance
    Page 8 3DMark06 Pro, DOOM 3 and FarCry Performance
    Page 9 Quake 4, Prey and Splinter Cell: CT Performance
    Page 10 Company of Heroes, F.E.A.R. and Supreme Commander Performance
    Page 11 Benchmark Analysis and Power Consumption
  • Page 12 Real-World Usage, Value and Conclusion

    Copyright(c) 2009 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Legal Notices | Licensing , Reprints , & Permissions | Privacy Policy



    WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs